A White House veteran who builds AI operating systems for government just told regulators to pump the brakes on agent rules.

The Summary

The Signal

Here's what makes this worth paying attention to. Scheidler isn't some libertarian tech bro yelling about government overreach. He's someone who's been inside the policy machine at the White House and State Department, and now he's building AI infrastructure that bridges government and private sector operations. When someone with that resume says we're about to regulate too early, it's not ideology. It's pattern recognition.

The specific phrase matters: "agentic workflows." Not AI in general. Not chatbots or recommendation engines. Workflows where agents take actions autonomously. This is the layer where Web4 actually happens, where your AI doesn't just answer questions but books the flight, negotiates the contract, files the permit. Regulating at the workflow level before we even understand what productive agent behavior looks like is like writing traffic laws before anyone's driven a car.

Helios builds operating systems for exactly this problem: how do you let agents operate across institutional boundaries without creating chaos or capture? The fact that someone solving this problem technically is warning about premature regulatory frameworks tells you the debate is moving faster than the technology is maturing.

The Implication

If you're building agent infrastructure, this is your signal to get louder about what actually needs guardrails versus what needs room to develop. The risk isn't that we get no regulation. The risk is that we get the wrong regulation, written by people who've never shipped an agent, locking in today's primitive architectures as the standard. Watch for working groups forming around agent standards in Q2. If you're not in those rooms, someone else is deciding your constraints.


Source: Bloomberg Tech